Monthly Archives: February 2017

Earned Income Tax Credit: A Redistribution of Wealth Law Designed to Help Middle & Low Income Households

By:  Coleman Jackson, Attorney, CPA
February 17, 2017

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is essentially a redistribution of wealth law

The Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) is essentially a redistribution of wealth law. Love cares for others- here, there and everywhere, and by expressions of gratitude with compassion stronger communities are built.    And In our time of growing income and wealth inequality here in the U.S. and around the globe, the Earned Income Tax Credit has been one area of U.S. federal tax policy designed to alleviate or, at least minimize, the financial pressures on low and middle income American citizens and resident immigrants.   The EITC lowers the federal tax burden on low and middle income earners while denying the credit to higher income households.   The EITC is a refundable tax credit where a taxpayer can receive a refund even though they had no federal taxes withheld from their wages during the tax year.  Tens of millions of hardworking workers could qualify for the Earned Income Tax Credit.  It is very important that workers, whether they are self-employed or wage earners, use the EITC Assistant on IRS.gov to determine whether they qualify for the EITC.

The Earned Income Tax Credit could be a financial boost in the arm; the EITC could be like a fuse or spark in the dark

The Earned Income Tax Credit could be a financial boost in the arm; the EITC could be like a fuse or spark in the dark.  In some situations amended tax returns should be filed because refunds could be due resulting from failure to take prior years Earned Income Tax Credit.  This could be necessary even though the taxpayer may have used a paid tax return preparer or prepared their return themselves using a tax return preparation software package.  Remember garbage into a computer generates garbage.  Lack of training could lead to misunderstanding and missed tax savings opportunities.  Preparing tax returns with insufficient knowledge and training is probably not too wise.  Again taxpayers should, at least, check the EITC Assistant on IRS.gov to ensure themselves that they are not leaving their EIC refund on the table.  Although a little more complex than this, typically, claims for tax refunds can be filed up to three years after the tax return is filed.

Earned Income Tax Credit qualifying guidelines are very complex and claiming the EITC in error could cause the errant taxpayer long-term tax headaches.  At a minimum an error in claiming EIC could delay your refund, and if your error is due to taking the EIC out of reckless abandonment or tax fraud, the taxpayer could be banned by the IRS from participation in the EIC program for two years.  The EIC qualification analysis begins with seeing whether your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) falls within certain parameters.  You have to have qualifying children.  If married, you and your spouse must have valid Social Security Number that you got by the due date of the return, including extensions.  Those taxpayers, who do not qualify for a Social Security Number, should review our law firm’s earlier blog with respect to changes in the ITIN Program.  That blog can be read on our blog-site by clicking here:  http://www.cjacksonlaw.com/blog/check-itin-expired-expiring-soon/ .  Additional qualifying factors for the EITC are such factors as, relationship of the child, age, residency; taxpayers claiming EIC cannot be claimed dependents on any other tax return.  These are only some of the requirements; the EITC computations and qualification guidelines are complex and must be followed in an exacting manner.

Earned Income Tax Credit changes have been recently proposed by the Internal Revenue Service.  The Internal Revenue Service has issued proposed regulations this month which softens the IRS former position when two or more people could claim a single child as a qualifying child for Earned Income Tax Credit purposes.  Further the disqualified individual, under the rule before the proposed rule change, is prohibited from claiming a childless EIC under Code Sec. 32(c)(1)(A) and (B).  Under the proposed regulations issued this month, the IRS has softened its prior position and said that it is in keeping with the spirit of the Earned Income Credit program’s design to ease the financial burden of modest earners, for the IRS to permit the disqualifying individual(s) to claim the childless EIC under Code Sec. 32(c)(1)(A) and (B).

Note that all proposed regulations must be finalized.  Finalization of all proposed regulations, have been banned under the current White House Administration indefinitely.  The proposed regulation that we have been discussing styled “Proposed Regulation 1.32-2(c)(3)” has; therefore, not been finalized, and may not be implemented anytime soon.  The White House moratorium on issuing new federal regulations; however, only potentially effects the proposed IRS changes to EIC program, and not the original EIC law.  Therefore, qualified low and middle income households can still claim the Earned Income Tax Credit.  Follow our blogs for future updates on this topic as well as other topics of interest to immigrants, their families, their businesses and other hard working Americans.

This law blog is written by the Taxation | Litigation | Immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. for educational purposes; it does not create an attorney-client relationship between this law firm and its reader.  You should consult with legal counsel in your geographical area with respect to any legal issues impacting you, your family or business.

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Taxation, Litigation, Immigration Law Firm | English (214) 599-0431 | Spanish (214) 599-0432

불이행 해외 계좌 소유주들을 IRS에 드러낼 확률이 높은 제3자 업체의 보고

제공:  콜맨 잭슨, 변호사, 공인 회계사
2017 년 2 월 8 일

불이행 해외 계좌 소유주들을 IRS에 드러낼 확률이 높은 제3자 업체의 보고

약 2 년간 해외에 위치한 “제3자 업체”로 또한 알려진 은행 및 타 금융기관들은 계정 소유자 정보를 미 재무부의 정부간 협정에 따라 직접 미 국세청에 혹은 간접적으로 미 지자체를 통해서 보고해 왔습니다.  논리적으로 내려진 결정은 미국인들의 (시민 및 영주권 소지자) 외국 은행 계좌 정보가 미 재무부 혹은 국세청에 전달됨에 따라서   점차적으로 미 준수 해외 계정 소유자는 완전히 국세청에 알려질 것입니다.

국세청에 대한 제3자 업체들의 해외 계정 소유자에 대한 보고는 IRS 해외 자진 신고 프로그램의 장점을 활용하는 계정 소유자의 수를 늘렸습니다. IRS 위원은 최근 다음과 같이 진술했습니다,

“IRS는 해외에 대한 조치의 여러 주요 획기적 계획을 통과시켜 100,000명의 납세자를 규정을 준수하게 만들고 총 100억 달러를 수집하였습니다.  외국 계좌에 대한 더 많은 정보를 수집함에 따라서 단속을 피해가려는 이들의 노력은 점차 더욱 어려워질 것입니다.  IRS는 계속해서 국제 세금 이슈가 있는 이들이 그들의 세금 관련 의무를 충족시키도록 촉구 합니다.”

교묘한 미 준수 해외 계좌 소유자들에 대한 권고는 책임 있게 행동하라는 것입니다. 만약 발각되는 경우 그들에 대한 벌칙은 매우 엄중하여 민사와 심지어 형사 기소까지도 가능합니다.  납세자는 두 가지 옵션이 있으며 옵션 (a)를 취하는 것은 어리석은 과정입니다:

  1. 아무 조치도 하지 않고 점차적으로 그들 자신, 가족 그리고 사업을 금융적 손실과 심지어 감옥으로 이끌게 됩니다. 이는 단지 진상을 외면하는 옵션입니다;
  2. 허용되는 동안 IRS 자진 신고 프로그램으로 해결을 합니다.

진상을 그만 외면하고 생각해 보세요!  보고에 따르면 IRS는 자발적으로 그들의 해외 계좌를 공개한 100,000명의 납세자에게서 $100억을 징수하였습니다.  이는 엄청난 금액이며; 제3자 업체들의 보고를 통해 드러난 미 준수 해외 계정 소유주들로부터 더 많은 금액을 징수하기 위한 노력으로 IRS가 최대로 과감한 징수 절차를 시행하는 것은 놀라운 일이 아닐 것입니다.  IRS가 해외 계좌 소유주의 정보를 확보 시; 해외 계좌 소유주가 세금 규정을 준수하게 하는 것은 단지 시간의 문제이며 IRS 자원과 어떻게 그들이 세금 준수 우선순위의 문제입니다; 혹은 모든 미 준수 해외 계좌 소유주들이 해외 계좌 세금 준수법 (FATCA); 그리고 FBAR로 알려진 해외 은행과 금융 계좌를 통제하는 법률을 포함하여 자발적으로 미 조세법률을 준수하도록 압력을 가하는 동시에 장려를 하는 것 또한 IRS의 시간, 자원, 운선순위의 문제입니다.  현명한 사람은 지혜가 있지만 어리석은 자들은 지혜에 반하여 행동합니다.

이 법률 블로그는 과세 | 소송 | 이민 법률 사무소의 콜맨 잭슨, P.C.가 교육 목적으로 제공합니다.; 이는 본 법률 사무소와 본 블로그의 독자들 사이에 변호사와 고객의 관계를 구성하지 않습니다.  귀하, 귀하의 가족 혹은 사업체에 영향을 미치는 모든 법률 이슈에 관하여 귀하의 지역 변호사와 상담하시기 바랍니다.

Willful Failure to File a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts

By:  Coleman Jackson, Attorney, CPA
February 01, 2017

Do you hold a financial account in a foreign country?

United States Persons who hold a financial account in a foreign country with a balance anytime during the calendar year of $10,000 or more must file a Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) report.  This disclosure is currently due on April 15th of each year.  The FBAR disclosure is made on the Financial Crimes Network’s Form 114.  FINCIN Form 114 is filed online on the Financial Crimes Network’s website.  The FBAR is mandated by the Bank Secrecy Act, 31 U.S. C. Sec. 5314, etc.

The Secretary of Treasury is authorized to impose civil monetary penalties when a person fails to file a required FINCIN Form 114.  The civil monetary penalty is capped at $10,000 unless the Secretary (the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)) finds that the person willfully failed to file the FBAR.  If the Secretary finds that the U.S. Person willfully failed to file a required FINCIN Form 114, a willful failure to file penalty can be assessed at the discretion of the Secretary of Treasury.  The maximum penalty imposed by the Secretary of Treasury for willfully failing to file a required FINCIN Form 114 is up to $100,000 or one-half the aggregate value in the account(s) at the time of the violation pursuant to U.S.C. 31 Sec. 5321.

A willful failure to file penalty can be assessed at the discretion of the Secretary of Treasury

What exactly does ‘willful failure to file’ mean as it relates to unfiled or tardy FINCIN Form 114 or FBARs?  First of all, in tax law, the term “willful” does not always actually require intent.  That means that a person does not have to actually ‘intend’ to skip filing a required FBAR.  There is a long line of tax cases where courts all over the country have found that taxpayers willfully failed to comply with tax laws where the courts simply ignored whether the taxpayer actually intended their actions or not.  Reckless failure to educate one-self of tax compliance obligations is sufficient for imposition of the willful failure to file penalty in a FINCIN Form 114 case.  Courts have long ruled in the U.S. Department Treasury’s favor where taxpayer’s “willful blindness” or “closed his eyes to discrepancies” or for that matter “conscious effort to avoid learning about reporting requirements” were at issue.  The question of willfulness is essentially a finding of fact.  See Safeco Ins. Co. of America v Burr, 551 U.S. 47, 57 (2007, and Rykoff v. United States, 40 F.3d 305, 307 (9th Cir. 1994) or United States v Poole, 640 F. 3d 114, 122 (4th Cir. 2011).  Failure to read documents and returns is no defense.  See also Greer v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 595 F.3d 338, 347 n 4 (6th Cir. 2010).  The tax return itself has been held by courts to place taxpayers on notice of FBAR requirements.  The court in Mohney said just that; see United States v. Mohney, 949 F. 2d 1397, 1407 (6th Cir. 1991).  Willful failure to file FBARs is a factual issue that the U.S. Treasury has been winning in Courts around the country.  Recently, December 20, 2016, in a U.S. District Court in the Western District of California, it is recorded in that Court’s filings that, Mr. & Mrs. Bohanec found that out the hard way.  The Court entered a judgment in favor of the Unites States of America and against the couple in the amount of $160, 915.75 plus all statutory accruals including interest and penalties plus costs and expenses.

Maybe the cases won by taxpayers are going unreported, maybe they are being settled before trial, or, maybe taxpayer’s wins in the Courts are simply very few where it comes to quivering over failing to file required FINCIN Form 114 (FBARS).  It is worth noting that the Internal Revenue Service has been operating Voluntary Disclosure Programs for several years designed to encourage U.S. Persons with foreign bank and financial accounts to come forward voluntarily rather than risk the possibility and probability of being detected through the Foreign Financial Institution reporting, or FFIs simply complying with the 30% withholding provisions of 26 C.F.R. Sec. 1.1471-2T(a)(1).

This law blog is written by the Taxation | Litigation | Immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. for educational purposes; it does not create an attorney-client relationship between this law firm and its reader.  You should consult with legal counsel in your geographical area with respect to any legal issues impacting you, your family or business.

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Taxation, Litigation, Immigration Law Firm | English (214) 599-0431 | Spanish (214) 599-0432