Category Archives: IRS Problems

Episode 3: Dealing with IRS Exams (Worker Misclassification)

Legal Thought’s – Episode 3 of Dealing with IRS Exams (Worker Misclassification)

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Transcript of Legal Thoughts
Published August 14, 2023

DOL Worker Classification Test | Horst Insurance

Attorney introduction:

Welcome to Legal Thoughts! My name is Coleman Jackson and I am an attorney at Coleman Jackson, P.C., a taxation, litigation, and immigration law firm based in Dallas, Texas.

In addition to myself, we have Leiliane Godeiro – Litigation Legal Assistant, and our administration staff Ernesto Munoz and Michelle Gutierrez.

On today’s “Legal Thoughts” podcast, our Litigation Legal Assistant, Leiliane Godeiro will be interviewing me in our continuing federal tax series entitled, “ Dealing with the IRS”.  In todays Legal Thoughts podcast the attorney will be talking about misclassification of a workers as an independent contractor when the worker should be classified as an employee of the employer.  This is Episode 3 in our Podcast series entitled Dealing with the IRS.  Here its dealing with the IRS examination division

Interviewer Introduction to the Audience:

Hi everyone, my name is Leiliane Godeiro and I am a Litigation Legal Assistant at the tax, litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Our law firm is located at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, right here in Dallas, Texas, 75206.

Good afternoon Attorney; thank you for being here with me to today as I interview you in our continuing podcast series entitled; “Dealing with the IRS”.

In this third episode in our law firm’s Legal Thoughts Podcast Dealing with the IRS series,  the focus today will be employer misclassification of workers.

 Attorney, let’s get started.

QUESTION 1: Attorney, please explain, why the classification of a worker is of any concern to the IRS to begin with?

 

Interviewee: Coleman Jackson, Lawyer

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 1

Good afternoon Leiliane;

Definitely for sure the Internal Revenue Service is very much interested in how workers are classified for tax purposes for all the reasons I am going to explain in a few minutes. But let me point out at the outset that how a worker is classified is not simply the concern of the IRS, workers themselves should be very concerned how they are classified; the Texas Work Force Commission also cares about how Texas workers are classified for labor law and tax law purposes; and the U.S. Department of Labor and other federal, state and local governmental agencies are also concerned about how workers are classified for all sought of societal reasons.

Now let me turn to the law that imposes this duty to care about worker classification squarely on the shoulders of the Internal Revenue Service which is the federal agency tasked with the responsibility to enforce the nations federal tax laws.

In this particular podcast; we are limiting our discussion of worker classification to federal tax matters. So, let me answer your question from – why should the IRS care about worker classification?

First, United States Code Chapter 26 gives the United States Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service which is the enforcing agency of the Treasury to oversee the application of the United States federal tax statutes.  26 U.S.C. is commonly referred to as the Internal Revenue Code.

Second, the Internal Revenue Service (the IRS) is the agency tasks with enforcing the Internal Revenue Code.

Third, the Internal Revenue Code, courts and the IRS has established rules for determining whether a worker is classified as an employee, a statutory employee, statutory nonemployee or independent contractor.

Fourth, there are significant tax consequences of worker classification for those who hired the worker and for the worker as well.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewer Comment:  Attorney, this sounds like it could be complicated!

QUESTION 2: Attorney can you explain in clear language what these different classifications of worker mean?

 

Interviewee: Coleman Jackson, Lawyer

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 2

Okay let me try to explain these terms:

First, the term employee is the common law 20 factor test characteristics established by the United States Supreme Court in a case decided around 1954. This is a common law test that contain 20 keep factors devised by the Court basically turns on the degree of control the employer of that particular worker has over the means, method, and results of the workers activities. The Texas Labor Code uses this same type of language when defining the term ‘employee’.  Workers performing under this degree of control ( or right of control by the person who hires them) are called  “Common Law Employee”. Most people refer to the ‘common law employee’ as simply ‘employee’.

Second, the term Independent Contractor applies to workers in the first category who do not meet the definition of common law employee. Independent Contractors excise control and independents not only over their results, but, their methods and means of carrying out their task. Independent Contractors  can experience monetary loss as the results of their work; whereas, employees typically receive their same salary or compensation whether the project or assignment generates a profit or loss.

Third, the term Statutory Employee is created by and defined in 26 USC (IRC Section 31201(d(3)) as workers performing services in four principal occupational areas: (a) certain drivers who distribute certain beverages, food-products and other goods or products, (b) workers from their home who are like fabricators, (c) traveling sales people who distribute merchandise for resale, and (d) life insurance sales persons.

Fourth, Statutory Non-Employees is created by and defined in 26 USC (IRC Sections 3506 and 3508) as certain real estate agents, direct sellers and certain placement service workers.

I left out some of the complexities of these Internal Revenue Code Sections.  The most important thing for our audience to know is that statutory workers are “employees”.  They are not independent contractors.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewer Comment: That sure came through loud and clear.  The main thing is whether the worker is properly classified as an independent contractor or whether they should be classified as an employee.  That much you have made clear! Now that you have made what these worker classifications mean is clear to us

QUESTION 3: What are the significant tax consequences of all this worker classification stuff?

 

Interviewee: Coleman Jackson, Lawyer

ATTORNEY ANSWER– QUESTION 3

The tax consequences to the various worker classifications that we have been discussing are these—

First, those who hire a ‘common law employee’ are required under the Internal Revenue Code to withhold federal income taxes, withhold federal insurance contributions act taxes and pay federal unemployment taxes on wages and compensation paid to an employee. Employers must give employees Form W-2, they must send W-2 to the Social Security Administration.  Employers are also required to compete Form I-9 on every employee and maintain I-9 files on each employee hired within days of the new hire.  Employers are also required to file quarterly returns to the IRS (Form 941) and annual reports as well (Form 940).

As for reporting requirements and filing requires, there is no distinction between a worker classified as a common law employee and those classified as statutory employee.

Second point I like to make is this one. Those who hire independent contractors are not typically required to make any withholdings from the workers pay check. But there can be instances where federal withholding laws impose a duty on the payor to withhold certain percentages from the payees pay check.  But there is never a fica or futa tax withholding or payment requirement on the payor of an independent contractor.  Independent Contractor compensation is typically reported on Forms 1099- Miscellaneous and 1099-NEC as appropriate depending upon the reason for the payment.  No reports are sent to the Social Security Administration on payments to independent contractors.  The only report filed with the IRS by those who employ an independent contractor is the Forms 1099 just mentioned.

Finally, as for those workers who are precluded from being classified as employees under the Internal Revenue Code Sections that I mentioned earlier, the reporting for statutory non-employees must be handled very similar to those of the independent contractor, which I will explain in detail next. No withholding requirements apply under normal situations; but, remember under some circumstances up to 30% mandatory withhold rules apply to payments to certain types of individuals under the United States tax law. Those who hire statutory non-employee workers are required to give them Forms 1099- Miscellaneous and 1099-NEC as appropriate and file appropriate copies with the IRS.

Keep in mind, I have left out all of the requirements imposed by State Law on those who hire workers. I left any discussion of this out because this podcast is limited to federal tax requirements and consequences for misclassification of workers.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewee’s Comment:  Absolutely attorney; this is only about federal tax law; but, if anyone in our audience want to hear a podcast about Texas tax laws as to how they apply to employers, employees or independent contractors, feel free to write us, call us or email us your request.

QUESTION 4:

Attorney to wrap this up.  My fourth question is this:  What happens if IRS exam determines that a worker is  misclassified?  I mean is anyone in big trouble?

 

Interviewee: Coleman Jackson, Lawyer

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 4

Not necessarily. It just depends upon why the worker is misclassified. It will mater whether it is by mistake or whether the workers are misclassified intentionally.  There are things the employer can do to correct the situation; and, in fact there are things a worker can do to find out whether they are properly classified.  Let me start first with things a worker can do:

The worker can file IRS form SS-8 with the Internal Revenue Service to ask for a determination based on the facts and circumstances of their employment.

Now as for those who hired the worker; the IRS has several voluntary disclosure programs for employers who may have misclassified their workers. These programs can be used even while under audit examination:

1. The Voluntary Classification Settlement Program (VCSP) permits qualifying taxpayers to reclassify workers as employees for employment tax purposes and receive a reduced penalty. The VCSP has strict guidelines as to who can qualify to use this amnesty type program;

2. The second relief valve for employers who misclassified workers as independent contractors when they are not, is referred to as the Section 530 relief program. This program under created under the Revenue Act of 1978 can be relied on by taxpayers even while under IRS examination.

3. The IRS also have other tax position disclosure programs that might work in this misclassification of worker space.

4. Any employer who is not sure how there workers should be classified can ask the IRS by filing an SS-8.

INTERVIEWER WRAP-UP: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Attorney, thank you for being here today with us, this information about dealing with an IRS when worker classification is a problem. Hopefully our audience finds it informative and helps them to know their rights as taxpayers; know how to protect their rights in the unfortunate event that they or their business has an IRS examination involving misclassification of their work force as independent contractors when they ought to be classified as employees. Likewise workers who are misclassified also suffer from this misclassification whether it was done intentionally or by accident, Attorney.

Our listeners who want to hear more podcasts like this one should subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or where ever you listen to your podcast. Everybody take care! And come back in about two weeks, for more taxation, contracts, litigation and immigration Legal Thoughts from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation, located right here in Dallas, Texas at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, Dallas, Texas 75206.

English callers: 214-599-0431 | Spanish callers: 214-599-0432 |Portuguese callers: 214-272-3100

 

ATTORNEY’S CLOSING REMARKS:

This is the end of “LEGAL THOUGHTS” for now

Thank you for giving us your valuable time this morning and listening to our law firm’s Legal Thoughts Podcast. This has been the first episode in our new podcast series entitled dealing with the IRS. Hope you enjoyed Episode Three: “ Dealing with an IRS Exam regarding misclassification of workers”.

If you want to see or hear more taxation, contracts, litigation, and immigration LEGAL THOUGHTS from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcast.

Stay tuned! We are here in Dallas, Texas, and want to inform, educate and encourage our communities on topics dealing with taxation, litigation, and immigration. Until next time, take care.

Episode 2: “Dealing with IRS Liens”

Legal Thought’s – Episode 2 of Dealing with IRS Liens

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Transcript of Legal Thoughts
Published July 31, 2023

Is There a Statute of Limitations on IRS Tax Liens? - SH Block Tax Services

Attorney introduction: Welcome to Legal Thoughts! My name is Coleman Jackson and I am an attorney at Coleman Jackson, P.C., a taxation, litigation, and immigration law firm based in Dallas, Texas.

In addition to myself, we have Leiliane Godeiro – Litigation Legal Assistant, and our administration staff Ernesto Munoz and Michelle Gutierrez.

On today’s “Legal Thoughts” podcast, our Litigation Legal Assistant, Leiliane Godeiro will be interviewing me in our continuing federal tax series entitled, “ Dealing with the IRS”. In todays Legal Thoughts podcast the attorney will be talking about IRS liens and the taxpayers’ options in dealing with them. This is Episode 2: “Dealing with IRS Liens”.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Hi everyone, my name is Leiliane Godeiro and I am a Litigation Legal Assistant at the tax, litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Our law firm is located at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, right here in Dallas, Texas, 75206.

Good afternoon Attorney; thank you for being here with me to today as I interview you in our continuing podcast series entitled; “Dealing with the IRS”.

In this second episode in this Legal Thoughts Podcast series,  our topic today is  “Dealing with IRS Liens”.

Attorney, let’s get started.

QUESTION 1: Attorney, please explain, what is an IRS lien?

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 1:

Good afternoon Leiliane;

The Federal Tax Line Act of that was enacted into law in 1966 created Internal Revenue Code Sections 6321 through 6326. These sections 26 United States Code, provides that “if any person liable to pay any tax neglects or refuses to pay the same after demand, the amount (including any interest, additional amount, additions to tax, or assessable penalty, together with any costs that may accrue in addition thereto) shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such person.”

Leiliane, what all this means in plain English is that the following facts have been established:

1.The IRS has made a tax assessment against the taxpayer (tax assessment simply means the IRS has put on the taxpayers’ tax account that the taxpayer owes the United States government due to taxable income tax, gift tax, estate tax or some other form of lawful taxes, penalties or interest; and

2.The IRS has followed all lawful procedures and notified you that you owe the outstanding taxes, penalties and interest; and

3.You the taxpayer has ignored the IRS notices to you or you otherwise has not made arrangements to satisfy the outstanding tax debt.

Note that the lien is created as a matter of law; if the above facts one through three are true, there is a tax lien created against you (the taxpayer) in favor of the United States government.  The lien creation does not require any court involvement or any further actions by you, the IRS or anyone else.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewee Comment:  Attorney what a IRS tax lien is now absolutely clear to me now!

QUESTION 2: Now that the IRS has a tax lien against the taxpayer, what now?

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 2

Well it means that the IRS tax lien attaches to all of the delinquent taxpayer’s real and personal property regardless of where it is located. Now this IRS tax lien attaches to the delinquent taxpayers property that is in existence on the date of the lien as well as any property in the future that the taxpayer has a legal interest in directly on indirectly. For example, putting property in a trust is ineffective in defeating an IRS lien because the lien attaches to all property that the delinquent taxpayer has any beneficiary interest in as well as any real and personal property acquired during the existence of the lien that the taxpayer has legal title.  The IRS tax lien is not defeated at death of the delinquent taxpayer either because the lien attaches to the decedent’s property both real property and personal property owned by the delinquent taxpayer.

The legal term “attaches” simply means that the IRS lien by law connects to the taxpayers property like glue to two pieces of paper; they are glued together and you cannot separate the two.

And Leliane, these are not all the ramifications for the delinquent taxpayer; there are potentially broad family and financial consequences as well resulting from the IRS tax lien.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

QUESTION 3: Attorney, what are some of those other ramifications of have an IRS tax lien?

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 3

Okay; the ramifications are very expansive. The two pieces of paper glued together tend to tell the story regarding the reach and strength of a IRS lien. Take for example these ramifications or effects of the tax lien on the delinquent taxpayer:

Credit – most people from time to time want to access a credit instrument to buy real estate, buy a car, investment in equipment, and all other kinds of activities that require money and the delinquent taxpayer cannot pay for in full with cash;

Employment – most people from time to time want to work or be employed to earn a living for themselves and their families. Employers may not want to hire someone who, perhaps, cannot handle their financial affairs in responsible way;

Family relations– most people from time to time want to be in a steady, stable and supportive family. Family members and potential family members could be reluctant to enter into or maintain relations under the stressful situation of dealing with bill collectors and the threat of financial ruin;

Responsible leadership positions– in their church, in their community, in their local, state and federal government. Some people will see the delinquent taxpayer as possibly irresponsible and dishonest.

Travel Restrictions— when a delinquent taxpayer owes more than $50,000, the IRS has the authority in U.S. tax law to refer the delinquent taxpayer to the U.S. Department of State for the purpose of restricting their U.S. passport or revoking it all together. This would not impact domestic travel; but, it most certainly will hinder travel to most international destinations which require valid passports to travel into the country.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewee’s Comment: I can see how all those negative consequences to occur when a taxpayer is under an IRS tax lien.

QUESTION 4: Attorney is there any possible way to legally get rid of an IRS tax lien?

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 4

  • Yes, indeed. There are several possible ways to get rid of an IRS lien:
  • First of all you need to test the validity of the lien to begin with; and
  • Assuming the lien is valid, consider getting rid of the lien by

1.Borrowing the money or earning the money to pay the tax debt in full.  You need to first check with the IRS Lien Operations to get the lien pay off balance.  Now this balance likely to be higher than any recent correspondence that you might have received from the IRS or any annual statements that you might have received from them;

2.Second, you can send an official request to the IRS to release or discharge the lien on certain pieces of property, to say, facilitate a real estate sells transaction.  This lien discharge procedure typically agreed to by the IRS to collect part or all of the outstanding debt from the real property transfer or sale.  The IRS tax is typically paid out of the escrow from the real property transaction;

3.Third, you can request that the IRS to withdraw the lien when the ten year statute of collection has expired;

4.Fourth, you can in some circumstances seek a release of the lien upon agreeing to an installment agreement with the IRS for monthly payments of the outstanding tax debt.

INTERVIEWER WRAP-UP: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Attorney, thank you for being here today with us, this information about dealing with an IRS lien. Hopefully our audience finds it informative and helps them to know their rights as taxpayers; know how to protect their rights in the unfortunate event that they or their business has an IRS tax lien; and hopefully our audience knows now how to preserve their legal rights under the federal tax code if they are unfortunately have a tax lien on their attached to their real and personal property.

Our listeners who want to hear more podcasts like this one should subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or where ever you listen to your podcast. Everybody take care! And come back in about two weeks, for more taxation, contracts, litigation and immigration Legal Thoughts from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation, located right here in Dallas, Texas at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, Dallas, Texas 75206.

English callers: 214-599-0431 | Spanish callers: 214-599-0432 |Portuguese callers: 214-272-3100

ATTORNEY’S CLOSING REMARKS

This is the end of “LEGAL THOUGHTS” for now.

Thank you for giving us your valuable time this morning and listening to our law firm’s Legal Thought Podcast. This has been the first episode in our new podcast series entitled dealing with the IRS. Hope you enjoyed Episode One: “ Dealing with an IRS Lien”.

If you want to see or hear more taxation, contracts, litigation, and immigration LEGAL THOUGHTS from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcast.

Stay tuned! We are here in Dallas, Texas, and want to inform, educate and encourage our communities on topics dealing with taxation, litigation, and immigration. Until next time, take care.

Episode 1: Dealing with IRS Penalties

Legal Thought’s – Episode 1 of Dealing with IRS Penalties

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Transcript of Legal Thoughts
Published July 17, 2023

 

Attorney introduction: Welcome to Legal Thoughts! My name is Coleman Jackson and I am an attorney at Coleman Jackson, P.C., a taxation, litigation, and immigration law firm based in Dallas, Texas.

In addition to myself, we have Leiliane Godeiro – Litigation Legal Assistant, and our administration staff Ernesto Munoz and Michelle Gutierrez.

On today’s “Legal Thoughts” podcast, our Litigation Legal Assistant, Leiliane Godeiro will be interviewing me in our federal tax series entitled, “ Dealing with the IRS”. In todays Legal Thoughts podcast the attorney will be talking about IRS penalties and the taxpayers’ options in dealing with them. This is Episode 1: “Dealing with IRS Penalties”.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Hi everyone, my name is Leiliane Godeiro and I am a Litigation Legal Assistant at the tax, litigation, and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Our law firm is located at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, right here in Dallas, Texas.

Good Morning Attorney; thank you for being here with me today as I interview you in our brand new federal tax series, “Dealing with the IRS”.

In this first episode in this new Legal Thoughts Podcast series,  our topic is “Dealing with IRS Penalties”.

Attorney, let’s get started.

Question 1: Why does the IRS charge penalties?

Attorney Answer – Question 1:

Leiliane; the federal tax code which is codified in 26 United States Code gives the Department of the United States Treasury the authority and mandate to administer and enforce the countries federal tax laws. The agency within the Department of United States Treasury with specific responsibility to maintain the integrity of the federal tax system and ensure compliance with federal tax laws and consistent treatment of taxpayers under the tax code is the Internal Revenue Service, (the, IRS).

So the broad answer to your question as to why the IRS imposes penalties for violations or noncompliance with the Internal Revenue Code is that the IRS is carrying out its function to protect the integrity of the federal tax system and ensure voluntary compliance with the federal tax laws. These IRS penalties are imposed on violators of the federal tax laws..

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewee Comment:  Oh, I see.

QUESTION 2: What kind of penalties does the IRS impose for violation of the Internal Revenue Code?

ATTORNEY ANSWER – QUESTION 2:

That question is broad; for sure, because the IRS imposes penalties for all kinds of violations of the Internal Revenue Code. Let me just mention a few broad areas and behaviors that could trigger IRS penalties:

1.Filing related penalties can be imposed by the IRS when a taxpayer has a duty to file a tax return and files it late or not at all.  These filing related penalties can be imposed by the IRS on all kinds or taxpayers for all manner of filing violations.

2.Accuracy related penalties ranges from taxpayers’ negligent mistakes and errors,  to their reckless and frivolous tax positions all the way to willful understatement of assets, overvaluations of assets, over and under statement of liabilities and erroneous equity position valuations.  These accuracy related penalties can be assessed against individuals, businesses, trusts, estates, and other entities.

3.Preparer liability related penalties are assessed by the IRS on professional tax return preparers  for failure to  comply with various due diligence requirements, or on return preparers who advise their tax clients to take frivolous tax positions, or reckless positions or tax positions on their returns that are simply not unfounded in law tax or facts.

The story that I am attempting to tell here is that there are all kinds of reasons and all kinds of individuals, businesses, entities who might be assessed IRS penalties for all kinds of tax violations.  Also their tax preparers likewise are subject to certain types of IRS penalties.  The IRS penalties are assessed to encourage compliance with federal tax laws.  Human beings are curious and ingenious in coming up with new ways and even schemes to avoid what they don’t want to do.  Probably not too many people like paying taxes… so penalties are assessed to help the curious, ingenious and schemer alike to comply with federal law.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

QUESTION 3: Attorney, what is the amount of money we are talking about in terms of IRS penalties?

Attorney Answer – Question 3:

IRS penalties can vary depending upon the type of tax violation. These penalties can be very substantial and they often continue to run until the underlying tax violation has been resolved. So that is the general answer to the question you asked.  Violators simply need to know that tax penalties in some instances can exceed the amount of the tax liability owed to begin with.

But let me deal with your question more specifically by naming a few IRS penalty rates:

1.Filing-Related Penalties Rates range all over the place depending upon the type of tax return involved; on your typical return, such as, the Form 1040, Form 1120, and Form 1065 the failure to file penalty begins at 20% of the net-amount due on the date the return was due not including any extensions of filing

2.Accuracy-Related Penalty Rates ranges from 5% to 20% based on the net-tax amount on the return due date not including any extensions of filing.  The quantum of the penalty is determined numerous factors that I am not going to go into right now.  In some instances, such as substantial valuation overstatements the penalty is 30% of the tax that should have been paid had the correct valuation or basis been used to begin with.  I am intentionally leaving out the specific Internal Revenue Code sections because it would be really getting into the weeds of federal tax law; and most of our podcast audience are not tax practitioners.  We don’t want to unnecessarily bombard them with tax law.  Just know, tax law is complex.

3.Information Reporting Penalties are imposed on employers for various violations for information reporting requirements in the tax code involving Form W-2, Form 1099, and so forth and can range from $50 per return if corrected within 30 days of the due date or $250 per return if its not corrected in 30 days.  Employers should know that information return penalties hand be brutal.

4.Penalties imposed on tax return preparers can range from $250 per return on returns taking unsustainable legal positions to the penalty regime designed to encourage tax return preparers to perform proper due diligence before taking certain tax positions, such as, earned income credit, head of household, and like tax positions.  The Code has imposed more-and-more due diligence requirements on return preparers over the years designed to encourage preparers to know the taxpayers for whom they prepare returns.

This is just the surface.  Like I said earlier I do not want to overwhelm our lay podcast audience by going too deep into the tax weeds.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Question 4: How long does the IRS have to charge a taxpayer these penalties you’ve been talking about Attorney?

Attorney Answer – Question 4:

Okay, Let me see whether I can keep this simple and straight forward:

1.If a taxpayer has a legal obligation under the Internal Revenue Code to file a tax return for a particular tax period but never filed the return, the IRS has forever to charge any applicable tax penalties, such as, failure to file penalties, accuracy penalties and any other penalties that can be lawfully charged based on the facts and circumstances.  Also the IRS has forever to audit the return and make tax adjustments and assessments.  This is so because the ‘three year statute of assessment’ never begins to run until the tax return is filed with the IRS.

2.If a taxpayer has a duty under the Internal Revenue Code to file a tax return and does file the return on or before the returns due date, the IRS has three years after the return was filed or its due date to assess any of the penalties that I previously mentioned.

3.Now let’s say the tax return was filed late.  With respect to late returns the IRS can assess the penalties beginning one day after the return is actually filed.

4.Keep in mind certain things that the taxpayer does and does not do can impact these assessment dates; such as, filing of an amended return and agreeing with an IRS representative to extend the statute of limitations for assessing penalties, interest and additional tax.  IRS examination of returns within this statute of limitation period can also impact the assessment of penalties, interest and tax.

INTERVIEWER: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Interviewee Comment: Attorney, I have one final question regarding this very interest topic: dealing with IRS penalties.

Question 5: What can a taxpayer do to minimize or get rid of IRS penalties?

Attorney Answer – Question 5:

If the penalty is resulting from an IRS audit examination, the taxpayer can ask for a hearing with the field examiner’s supervisor and if that fails to resolve the issues, the taxpayer can seek an audit redetermination where the penalty can be addressed or the taxpayer can seek redress in the IRS Independent Office of Appeals.

Taxpayers can seek penalty relief from an IRS penalty assessment by filing a Penalty Abatement or Refund Request with the field office where the return was filed and go to the IRS Independent Office of Appeals in the event the taxpayer is still unsatisfied with the results.

The taxpayer also have the right to file a petition with the United States Tax Court. It is very important that the tax court petition be timely filed. The taxpayer has 90 days from receipt of the IRS additional tax assessment, penalties and interest to file a complaint with the U.S. Tax Court without having to first pay the tax assessment.

I have summarized briefly the taxpayers options. It is more complex and taxpayers with these types of additional tax, penalty and interest assessments should contact legal counsel immediately upon receipt of any correspondence from the IRS or IRS examinations. For to protect and preserve your rights under the Internal Revenue Code, taxpayers must know their legal rights.

In all of the remedies that might be available to the taxpayer in penalty relief cases; the taxpayer must have acted reasonably and have ‘reasonable cause’ defense. Evidence must be gathered and marshaled to make reasonable cause defense arguments. Relief from IRS additional taxes resulting from examination, penalty and interest assessments cannot be based on thin-air, or groundless arguments; but, based in federal tax law and facts.

INTERVIEWER Wrap-up: Leiliane Godeiro, Litigation Legal Assistant

Attorney, thank you for being here today with us, this information about dealing with the IRS penalty. Hopefully our audience finds it informative and helps them to know their rights as taxpayers; know how to protect their rights in the unfortunate event that they are being examined by the IRS; and hopefully our audience knows now how to preserve their legal rights under the federal tax code if they are unfortunately hit with a IRS tax penalty.

Our listeners who want to hear more podcasts like this one should subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or where ever you listen to your podcast. Everybody take care! And come back in about two weeks, for more taxation, contracts, litigation and immigration Legal Thoughts from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation, located right here in Dallas, Texas at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, Dallas, Texas 75206.

English callers: 214-599-0431 | Spanish callers: 214-599-0432 |Portuguese callers: 214-272-3100

Attorney Conclusion:

This is the end of “LEGAL THOUGHTS” for now.

Thank you for giving us your valuable time this afternoon and listening to our law firm’s Legal Thoughts Podcast. This has been the first episode in our new podcast series entitled dealing with the IRS. Hope you enjoyed Episode One: “ Dealing with IRS Penalties”.

If you want to see or hear more taxation, contracts, litigation, and immigration LEGAL THOUGHTS from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify, or wherever you listen to your podcast.

Stay tuned! We are here in Dallas, Texas, and want to inform, educate and encourage our communities on topics dealing with taxation, litigation, and immigration. Until next time, take care.

The Worker: Employee or Independent Contractor?

The Worker:  Employee or Independent Contractor?

Why does it matter legally how workers are classified?

By Coleman Jackson, Attorney, and CPA.

Date: June 14, 2023.

Are your workers employees or independent contractors?    Why does it matter legally how workers are classified?

How should you make the determination as to whether a worker is classified as an employee or as an independent contractor?

How does the Internal Revenue Service make the determination?  How does the Texas Workforce make the determination for employment tax purposes?

Typically, when Internal Revenue Service auditors examine a business for the purpose of determining worker classification, the Service will generally follow the United States Supreme Court’s 1947 decision in a case called, United States vs. Silk.

In the Silk case, the United States Supreme Court said that whether a worker is properly classified as an employee or independent contractor turns on all the facts and circumstances. The Court delineated 20 factors, which if a majority of the factors can be answered yes, then the Internal Revenue Service will more likely than not classify the worker as an employee. These 20 factors are as follows:

  1. Is the worker required to comply with instructions about when, where, and how the work is to be done?
  2. Is the worker provided training that would enable them to perform the job in a particular way?
  3. Must the worker perform the services personally?
  4. Is there a continuing relationship between the worker and the entity that hired the worker?
  5. Are the services provided by the worker an integral part of the business’ operations?
  6. Does the entity hire, supervise or pay assistants to help the worker on the job?
  7. Does the recipient of the worker’s services set the work schedules?
  8. Is the worker required to devote his or her full time to the person for whom he or she performs services?
  9. Are the services performed at the place of business of the entity or at specific places designated by the business?
  10. Does the recipient of the services direct the sequence in which the work must be done?
  11. Is the method of payment hourly, weekly, or monthly as opposed to commission or by the job?
  12. Are business and/or traveling expenses reimbursed by the business to the worker?
  13. Are regular oral or written reports required to be submitted by the worker?
  14. Does the company furnish computers, work tools, and supplies used by the worker?
  15. Has the worker failed to invest in equipment or facilities used to provide services?
  16. Does the arrangement put the worker in the position of realizing either a loss or profit on the work?
  17. Does the worker perform services exclusively for the entity rather than working for various other entities at the same time?
  18. Does the worker make the worker’s services available to the general public?
  19. Is the worker subject to dismissal for reasons other than nonperformance of contract specifications?
  20. Can the worker terminate the relationship without incurring liability for failure to complete the assigned job?

 Why does it matter how a worker is classified?

  1. The cost of misclassification of workers can be tremendous.
  2. First and foremost, your employees could be erroneously carrying the burden of self-employment taxes.
  3. Misclassification of your workers means that you (the employer) are not paying your fair share of taxes and that may subject you to back taxes, interest, and penalties. The Service wants the taxes to be paid by the proper party.  Noncompliant entities could be eligible for certain safe-harbor provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
  4.  There are also certain State of Texas consequences for failing to properly classify workers.  Therefore, the proper worker classification is a federal and state tax law issue.  There could be civil and criminal consequences for failing to properly classify workers in the State of Texas.
  5.  It is important that immigrants pay their fair share of taxes.  It is also fair for immigrants to be properly classified as employees or independent contractors depending upon all the facts and circumstances.

 What about the Texas Work Force Commission?

The Texas Labor Code defines the employee and employer relationship very similar to how this relationship is defined in federal labor law and tax law.  The Texas Workforce Commission, (TWC) is tasked with the duties of enforcing the Texas Labor Code.  Misclassification of workers is typically investigated after the commission receives a complaint or when TWC audit examinations uncover evidence that an establishment has misclassified workers as independent contractors when in reality the workers are employees.  Misclassification of workers has State law and Federal law consequences.  The Internal Revenue Service and Texas Workforce Commission can work together in enforcing labor laws as it relates to tax violations.

Why Risk Being Caught – Act Now!

If you are a worker and don’t know how you should be classified, you should contact a tax attorney to discuss all the facts and circumstances of your particular situation because all the facts and circumstances matter in determining whether a worker is properly classified.

If you are an employer and are in doubt as to whether you have properly classified your workforce you should review all of the facts and circumstances with competent tax counsel today since long stretches of time could elapse before you are audited by TWC or the IRS.  You see the problem is that both the federal and state government may be short-changed if the taxes are not being properly and timely reported.  In 2023 the chances of getting caught for misclassification of workers is higher than in years past because the IRS has been given a lot more money to update its systems, go after tax cheats, and to ensure tax compliance and integrity of the federal tax system.

This law blog is written by the Taxation | Litigation | Immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. for educational purposes; it does not create an attorney-client relationship between this law firm and its reader.  You should consult with legal counsel in your geographical area with respect to any legal issues impacting you, your family, or your business.

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Taxation, Litigation, Immigration Law Firm | English (214) 599-0431 | Spanish (214) 599-0432 | Portuguese (214) 272-3100

 

FACTS MATTER! TAXPAYERS CAN WIN WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE FBAR CASES IN COURT!

FACTS MATTER!  TAXPAYERS CAN WIN WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE FBAR CASES IN COURT!

By Coleman Jackson, Attorney, CPA

March 16, 2023

Upcoming Beneficial Owners Information Reporting Requirements

Under United States law an annual reporting and disclosure responsibility is placed on any United States person with any financial interest in or signatory authority over, a bank, brokerage, stock, or any other financial account in a foreign country.  See 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5314(a) and regulation 31 C.F.R. Sec. 1010.350(a).  The Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”), U.S.C. Sec. 5311, et seq., requires U.S. persons to keep records and file reports with respect to their foreign bank account holdings.  United States Person is defined in the statute and regulations as U.S. citizens, resident aliens, trusts, estates, and domestic entities that have an interest in foreign financial accounts and meet the reporting threshold under the statute.  The reporting threshold is bank account(s) with balances of $10,000 at any time during the calendar year in either one financial account or any combination of financial accounts.  U.S. citizens and lawful permanent residents of the United States are included in the definition of U.S. persons regardless of where they actually reside in the world, so long as, their U.S. citizenship has not been forfeited, or LPR’s Green Card status has not been administratively or judicially revoked or abandoned.  Moreover, resident aliens of U.S. territories and U.S. territory entities are also subject to FBAR reporting.

Currently the FBAR is filed on Form 114 each April 15th with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network.  The civil penalties vary depending upon whether the U.S. person who failed to timely file Form 114 acted in a non-willful manner or whether they acted in a willful manner.  Non-willful violations of the FBAR filing requirements result in a maximum penalty of $10,000.  However, the penalty for willfully violating the FBAR reporting requirements can result in a civil penalty of the greater of $100,000 or fifty percent of the highest balance in the account at the time of the violation.  See 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5321(a) for a full discussion of permitted penalties that can be exacted on U.S. persons who violate the FBAR reporting requirements.    The U.S. Congress has written the FBAR statutes in such a way, well the best way to describe it is like this—strict liability.   In the case of willful violation; upon conviction it is strict liability for sure because there is no reasonable cause defense available to a taxpayer who willfully violates the FBAR disclosure requirements.  But as we disclose later in this blog, facts and circumstances matter in willful failure to file cases.  But as for the non-willful cases, let’s make clear right now:  Reasonable Cause is a possible defense for non-willful violations of the FBAR statutes.  If the U.S. person did not fail to file or the failure to timely file was attributable to a reasonable cause (such as reliance on accountants or professional tax preparers or other credible reasons), there should not be an FBAR penalty and any attempts by the IRS to collect a penalty would be a violation of the statute.  See White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. 465, 477 (2003) and 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5321(a)(5)(B)(ii)(I)

In this blog, we will focus on the alleged willful violation of the FBAR reporting requirements.  First the taxpayer need to remain silent because the Courts have said the burden of proof is on the Internal Revenue Service to prove that the taxpayer willfully violated the FBAR reporting requirements.    MAKE NO ADMISSONS that you had the requisite intent to violate the law.  An admission to an IRS examiner, agent or officer will be difficult to overcome even with the most skillful legal team.  So the best thing is to remain silent, seek legal counsel and fully cooperate with the IRS.  That does not include making uninformed admissions. The law governing FBAR (when is actions non-willful, inadvertent as opposed to willful) is complex and what the taxpayer may think is an honest statement or rendition of facts, may not be the whole truth and nothing but the truth.  It is hard and perhaps impossible to unravel half-truths, errors, misunderstandings or outright lies without unintended legal consequences.  Lies tumble into more lies and unless the taxpayer is into gymnastics, its best to leave the tumbling to the experts.

What is willful behavior in federal tax law?  Willful conduct is clearly something more than negligence or inadvertent actions. The United States Supreme Court stated over ten years ago that “where willfulness is a statutory condition of civil liability, it is generally taken to cover not only knowing violations of a standard, but reckless ones as well.”  The U.S. Supreme Court case of  Safeco Ins. Co. of Am. v Burr, 551 U.S. 47, 57 (2007) controls what the IRS must prove if they hope to prevail in a civil ‘willful violation of the FBAR reporting requirements case’.    Note that negligence or inadvertent actions are not included in the U.S. Supreme Court’s ‘willful’ definition.  Negligent and inadvertent failure to comply with the FBAR reporting requirements are classified as ‘non-willful violations’; and in those cases the offending U.S. person should raise all reasonable cause defenses that might be plausible under the circumstances.  The taxpayer should not pay any more penalty than they lawfully owe after considering all the facts and circumstances.  Beware:   repetitive violations of the FBAR reporting requirements could possibly be construed as ‘willful behavior’.  Multiple inadvertent errors may not pass the smell test—this reckless behavior could be the stench of willful snubbing the tax system, and could very likely lead to a ‘willful violation’ charge and even possibly a tax evasion charge.  If those are the facts and circumstances, a reasonable cause defense is seriously jeopardized.  Recklessness is but a few steps from intentional.  The more education U.S. persons have regarding the things discussed in this blog; the closer on the ‘decision continuum’ they come to ‘recklessness and intentional’ when their subsequent behavior doesn’t conform to their level of knowledge.  Good moral character matters in tax law- and everywhere else in a civil society.

The best way to look at this is in what I refer to as a “decision continuum “; in the case of ‘failure to timely comply with the FBAR reporting requirements’ that decision continuum – goes from negligence to one or more inadvertent actions on to many more inadvertent actions to intentional actions resulting in failure to comply with the FBAR reporting requirements.  The proper civil penalty, if any, depends upon the U.S. person’s culpability in failing to comply with the law.  The actual penalty paid could range from zero dollars in the case of a successful reasonable cause defense in a non-willful violation case to millions or more dollars in high dollar foreign bank accounts with willful violation of the FBAR reporting requirements.  A penalty based on a percentage of the foreign bank account balance can become enormous quickly!  In reality the FBAR penalties coupled with other tax penalties and interest could erase a taxpayers’ wealth and upon conviction take away their liberty.  Taxpayers should never concede anything in these cases because the monetary exposure can be extremely high!  There are also potential criminal exposures for FBAR violations; we have written about criminal exposures resulting from FBAR violations in one or more of our previous blogs; the standards of proof and burdens in criminal matters are different than in those civil cases.  We will skip that discussion here.    Best initial strategy in FBAR cases is silence until the U.S. person and their legal team can figure out what they are dealing with and develop the ideal legal strategy under the circumstances.

If the IRS attempts to impose the ‘willful violation penalty’ which is the greater of $100,000 or fifty percent of the account balance at the time of the violation, remember; in a civil penalty case the government must prove your actions were ‘willful’.  They must prove by a preponderance of the evidence (more likely than not) that you willfully did something other than sign your tax return.   Nor does checking the box “NO” concerning foreign bank accounts on the tax return constitutes  prima facie evidence of ‘willful intent to violate the FBAR reporting requirements’.  Often in the past the IRS has made these arguments about the signature and the checked boxes on the taxpayer’s tax return.  But Courts have repetitively stated that “a taxpayer’s signature on a return does not in itself prove his knowledge of the contents”.  A competent court will examine all the facts and circumstances then apply the applicable laws which mean that there is room for argument and putting forward a vigorous defense.  In a case United States v Mohney, 949 F.2d 1397 (6th Cir. 1991), the Court describes the nuance that courts goes through when analyzing these types of tax cases.   By the way, these cases can be tried in federal district court, federal claims court or in the U.S.  Tax Court.  Cases can be tried in the tax court without first paying the penalty; however, in the district courts or federal claims court, taxpayer’s must first pay the civil FBAR penalty and any other related tax penalties and interest.

An FBAR penalty case decided in April 2017 in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ( Case 2:15-cv-05853-MMB, Arthur Bedrosian v The United States of America, Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service) should  give taxpayer’s struggling through IRS allegations of willful violation of FBAR reporting requirements  heart.  In Bedrosian case, the taxpayer won against the U.S. government’s willful failure to file FBAR allegation in court!  Taxpayers can win willful failure to file FBAR cases in court!  As reported by the Court in the Bedrosian case, Bedrosian, a Chief Executive Officer in the pharmaceutical industry was a United States citizen who had two foreign bank accounts.  For years on the advice of his accountants, he failed to disclose these accounts on his tax return and he did not file the required FBAR reports for either account although the reporting threshold of $10,000 was met in those years.  In 2007 after going to another accountant for his tax work, he was advised that he had FBAR filing issues.  He disclosed one of the accounts but not the other in his 2007 FBAR filings.  To be brief:   the IRS sent him a letter on July 18, 2013 stating that it was imposing a penalty for his willful failure to file TDF 90.22.1.   The FBAR reporting Form in 2007 was Form TDF 90.22.1; it is now Form 114.  Anyway, the IRS proposed to access a penalty of $975,789.17 which was 50% of the maximum value of the account ($1,951,578.34) which is the largest permitted penalty under the statute.    Bedrosian filed suit in federal district court in October 27, 2015.  The thing to note in the Bedrosian case is that the Court said facts matter in willful failure to file FBAR cases!  The government must prove Bedrosian willfully failed to submit an accurate FBAR report in 2007; Bedrosian’s knowledge concerning his FBAR reporting requirements are relevant facts, and his relationship with his accountants are also relevant facts; even though, there are no reasonable cause defense in ‘willful failing to file FBAR cases’.   FACTS MATTER!  TAXPAYERS CAN WIN WILLFUL FAILURE TO FILE FBAR CASES IN COURT!   The point of this case is U.S. persons may have hope in court in willful failure to file FBAR cases because the IRS must prove that the taxpayer willfully violated the FBAR statute.   This is true even though ‘a reasonable cause’ exception only exist for non-willful violations as shown in 31 U.S.C. Sec. 5321(a)(5(C)(ii).   Intent to violate the statute  or reckless disregard of the disclosure requirements (don’t give a hoot attitude) must be proved; what someone’s intent is can be proven by direct evidence; such as an admission against interest, credible witness testimony, contemporaneous letters or documents; but most likely, the courts will decide these type of cases on all the facts and circumstances.  The government must prove that the taxpayer violated the statue willfully, which has been defined by the U.S. Supreme Court and subsequent courts as ‘knowing intent or reckless behavior’.  If the facts are on the U.S. person’s side, taxpayers can win willful failure to file FBAR cases in court.

This law blog is written by the Taxation | Litigation | Immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. for educational purposes; it does not create an attorney-client relationship between this law firm and its reader.  You should consult with legal counsel in your geographical area with respect to any legal issues impacting you, your family or business.

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Taxation, Litigation, Immigration Law Firm | English (214) 599-0431 | Spanish (214) 599-0432 | Portuguese (214) 272-3100

THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OPINED THAT THE REPORT OF FOREIGN BANK AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS MAXIMUM NONWILLFUL VIOLATION PENALTY IS $10,000 PER FBAR NOT PER ACCOUNT

THE U.S. SUPREME COURT OPINED

THAT THE REPORT OF FOREIGN BANK AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTS

MAXIMUM NONWILLFUL VIOLATION PENALTY IS $10,000 PER FBAR NOT PER ACCOUNT

By:  Coleman Jackson, Attorney & Certified Public Accountant

March 6, 2023

Upcoming Beneficial Owners Information Reporting Requirements

The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and its implementing regulations require certain individuals to file annual reports with the federal government about their foreign bank accounts. The statute imposes a maximum $10,000 penalty for nonwillful violations of the law. But recently a question has arisen in the U.S. Supreme Court. Does someone who fails to file a timely or accurate annual report commit a single violation subject to a single $10,000 penalty? Or does that person commit separate violations and incur different $10,000 penalties for each account not properly recorded within a single report? Because the Ninth Circuit read the law one way and the Fifth Circuit the other, the U.S. Supreme Court took the case and recently decided in favor of the taxpayers.

BSA simply requires those who possess foreign accounts with an aggregate balance of more than $10,000 to file an annual report on a form known as an “FBAR”—the Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts. 31 U. S. C. §5314; 31 CFR §1010.306 (2021). These reports are designed to help the government “trace funds” that may be used for “illicit purposes” and identify “unreported income” that may be subject to taxation separately under the terms of the Internal Revenue Code.

9th Circuit case: Jane Boyd, an American citizen, held 13 relevant accounts in the United Kingdom. Because the aggregate amount in Ms. Boyd’s accounts exceeded $10,000 in 2009, she should have filed an FBAR in 2010. Neglecting to do so, she corrected the error in 2012, submitting a complete and accurate report at that time. The government acknowledged that Ms. Boyd’s violation of the law was “non-willful”, and imposed a $130,000 penalty—$10,000 for each of her 13 late-reported accounts. Ninth Circuit vindicated Ms. Boyd’s view, holding that the BSA authorizes “only one nonwillful penalty when an untimely, but accurate, FBAR is filed, no matter the number of accounts.” 991 F. 3d, at 1078.

5th Circuit case: Alexandru Bittner was born and raised in Romania, but immigrated to the United States at a young age in 1982 and became a naturalized citizen. After the fall of communism, Mr. Bittner returned to Romania in 1990 where he launched a successful business career. Like many dual citizens, he did not appreciate that U. S. law required him to keep the government apprised of his overseas financial accounts even while he lived abroad. Shortly after returning to the United States in 2011, Mr. Bittner learned of his reporting obligations and engaged an accountant to help him prepare the required reports—covering five years, from 2007 through 2011. Under governing regulations, filers with signatory authority over or a qualifying interest in fewer than 25 accounts must provide details about each account, but individuals with 25 or more accounts need only check a box and disclose the total number of accounts. 31 CFR §1010.350(g). Mr. Bittner and his new accountant volunteered details for each and every one of his accounts—61 accounts in 2007, 51 in 2008, 53 in 2009 and 2010, and 54 in 2011. 19 F. 4th, at 738.  Because the government took the view that nonwillful penalties apply to each account not accurately or timely reported, and because Mr. Bittner’s late-filed reports for 2007–2011 collectively involved 272 accounts, the government thought a fine of $2.72 million was in order. Mr. Bittner challenged his penalty in court, arguing that the BSA authorizes a maximum penalty for nonwillful violations of $10,000 per report, not $10,000 per account. The district court agreed with Mr. Bittner’s reading of the law, United States v. Bittner, 469 F. Supp. 3d 709, 724–726 (ED Tex. 2020), but the Fifth Circuit upheld the government’s assessment, 19 F. 4th, at 749.

 

U.S. Supreme Court decision: To resolve who has the better reading of the law, U.S. Supreme Court begins with the terms of the most immediately relevant statutory provisions, 31 U. S. C. §5314 and §5321. Section 5314 (Secretary of the Treasury “shall” require certain persons to “keep records, file reports, or keep records and file reports” when they “mak[e] a transaction or maintai[n] a relation” with a “foreign financial agency.”) does not speak of accounts or their number. The word “account” does not even appear. Instead, the relevant legal duty is the duty to file reports. Whether a report is filed late, whether a timely report contains one mistake about the “address of [the] participants in a transaction,” or whether a report includes multiple willful errors in its “description of . . . transaction[s],” the duty to supply a compliant report is violated. As a baseline, §5321(a)(5) authorizes the Secretary to impose a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for “any violation” of §5314. The law still does not speak of accounts or their number. Also, the law authorizes the Secretary to impose a maximum penalty of either $100,000 or 50% of “the balance in the account at the time of the violation”—whichever is greater. §§5321(a)(5)(C) and (D)(ii). So here, at last, the law does tailor penalties to accounts. But the statute does so only for a certain category of cases that involve willful violations, not for cases like ours that involve only nonwillful violations. When Congress includes particular language in one section of a statute but omits it from a neighbor, we normally understand that difference in language to convey a difference in meaning (expressio unius est exclusio alterius). The government’s interpretation defies this traditional rule of statutory construction. Therefore, the Supreme Court held that the BSA’s $10,000 maximum penalty for the non-willful failure to file a compliant FBAR should be calculated on a per report, rather than a per account, basis. The decision, which was issued on February 28, 2023, was a close vote, 5-4, with Justice Barrett writing in the dissent, “The most natural reading of the statute establishes that each failure to report a qualifying foreign account constitutes a separate reporting violation, so the Government can levy penalties on a per-account basis. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit and remanded the case back to district court.

 

What does the Supreme Court’s Decision in Bittner Mean to Foreign Bank Account Holders:

What is not clear is what this means for taxpayers who have paid civil fines for unintentional account violations in the past. The ruling also raises the question of whether the IRS will be more aggressive in characterizing violations as willful now that differences in penalty calculations will be more significant.

This law blog is written by the Taxation | Litigation | Immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. for educational purposes; it does not create an attorney-client relationship between this law firm and its reader.  You should consult with legal counsel in your geographical area with respect to any legal issues impacting you, your family or business.

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Taxation, Litigation, Immigration Law Firm | English (214) 599-0431 | Spanish (214) 599-0432 | Portuguese (214) 272-3100

 

 

EPISODE 3: Starting Your First Business in Texas – State and Federal Tax Obligations and the Upcoming FinCEN BOI Reports

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Transcript of Legal Thoughts
Published December 26, 2022

Overview:  

Legal Thoughts is an audiocast presentation by Coleman Jackson, P.C., a law firm based in Dallas, Texas serving individuals, businesses, and agencies from around the world in taxation, contract litigation, and immigration legal matters.

This episode of Legal Thoughts is an audiocast where the Attorney, Coleman Jackson is being interviewed by Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant of Coleman Jackson, P.C. The topic of discussion is “Starting Your First Business in Texas – State and Federal Tax Obligations and the Upcoming FinCEN BOI Reports.” You can listen to this podcast by clicking here:

If you enjoy this podcast, make sure to stay tuned for more episodes from the taxation, litigation, and immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. Be sure to subscribe. Visit the taxation, litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. online at www.cjacksonlaw.com.

 

TRANSCRIPT:

ATTORNEY: Coleman Jackson

LEGAL THOUGHTS

COLEMAN JACKSON, ATTORNEY & COUNSELOR AT LAW

 

ATTORNEY: Coleman Jackson

Welcome to Legal Thoughts

My name is Coleman Jackson and I am an attorney at Coleman Jackson, P.C., a taxation, contract litigation and immigration law firm based in Dallas, Texas.

In addition to myself, we have Alexis Brewer – Tax Legal Assistant, Leiliane Godeiro – Litigation Legal Assistant, and Johanna Powell – Tax Legal Assistant.

On today’s “Legal Thoughts” podcast, our Tax Legal Assistant, Alexis Brewer, will be interviewing me on the important topic of: Starting Your First Business in Texas. This is a series of podcasts, and today’s episode will focus on: “State and Federal Tax Obligations and the Upcoming FinCEN BOI Reports”

 

INTERVIEWER: Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant

Hi everyone, my name is Alexis Brewer and I am a Tax Legal Assistant at the tax, contract litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Our law firm is located at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, right here in Dallas, Texas.

Good afternoon, Attorney; thank you for agreeing to sit with me as I interview you with respect to this hot tax topic: “Starting Your First Business in Texas – State and Federal Tax Obligations and the Upcoming FinCEN BOI Reports.”

Let’s jump right in,

Question 1: Attorney could you give us a quick picture of the type of taxes imposed in state of Texas?

 

Attorney Answer – Question 1:

Hello Alexis.

First and foremost, everyone needs to understand that the State of Texas imposes a series of taxes on individuals and businesses, but there are no income taxes in Texas.  Also, folks, individuals and businesses need to understand that property taxes are levied by local governments, such as, city, county, school districts and etc. throughout the State of Texas.  The law of local property taxes is fairly straight forward and our law firm does not practice this area of law.

  1. So, let me name several of the significant taxes imposed on individuals and businesses. Texas imposed the following taxes, among others:
  2. Limited Sales, Use and Excise Taxes are imposed on individuals and businesses;
  3. Texas Franchise Taxes are imposed on certain types of businesses;
  4. Estate and Generation-Skipping Taxes are imposed on estates;
  5. Unemployment Compensation Taxes are imposed on employers in Texas with employees;
  6. Alcoholic Beverages Taxes are imposed on establishments with such licenses to sell or distribute alcoholic products;
  7. Insurance taxes;
  8. Hotel taxes are imposed on guess of hotels, motels and similar establishments;
  9. Motor fuel taxes

This is just a list of eight types of taxes imposed by the State of Texas which generates the most revenue for the state.  There are a number of other types of taxes that Texas imposes on individuals and businesses operating within the State of Texas.  Anyone wishing to discuss these taxes can contact us with any specifics or follow our Blogs at www.cjacksonlaw.com; or follow our Legal Thoughts Podcasts; or follow our Law Watch videos on our You-Tube Channel where we frequently discuss various topics dealing with taxation, contracts, litigation and immigration matters those folks ought to know about.

 

INTERVIEWER: Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant

That leads me right into my next question, Attorney –

Question 2: What is the number one type of tax imposed by the State of Texas that everyone in Texas needs to know about?

 

Attorney Answer – Question 2:

Well Alexis, property taxes that are imposed by local governments is clearly a tax everyone in Texas should be aware of since Texas is one of the highest property tax states in the nation.  Property Taxes are taxes imposed by local governments throughout the State of Texas.  All people residing in Texas need to know about the property tax system because this is how public schools are financed as well as public hospitals and health services and a number of other major local and municipal services.

Alexis with that said, the number one type of tax imposed by the state that everyone needs to be aware of is the Texas Limited Sales, Use and Excise tax which is applies to most purchases of goods and some services.

Remember, as I previously stated; Texas does not have a state income tax.  So, our listeners should be asking themselves; so how does the State of Texas pay its bills?   The Limited Sales, Use & Excise Tax is; by far, the biggest tax revenue generator for the State of Texas.  The Limited Sales, Use, & Excise Tax generates about 58% of Texas’ tax revenues annually. This is the first major tax imposed by the State of Texas that everyone in Texas must be aware of.  Anyone operating a business or thinking about starting a business in Texas must do their due diligence with respect to whether their products, goods and services are subject to the Limited Sales, Use, & Excise Tax. If their products and services are subject to this tax; the business-owner is a trustee for the State of Texas and must obtain a sales tax permit, collect the appropriate sales taxes from each transaction and report and submit the monies to Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts, who is the chief tax collector for the State of Texas.  Business owners and other responsible parties can become personally liable for messing with Texas with respect to these sales, use and excise tax matters.

Texas imposes a 6.25% sales and use tax on sales, leases and rentals of touchable movable property (“tangible property”) and on certain specified services in Texas Tax Code Section 151.  Localities are also allowed to impose up to a maximum of 2% sales and use tax with respect to transactions within their jurisdictions.  The maximum limited sales, excise and use tax permitted in the Texas Tax Code is 8.25% of the gross taxable sales amount.

The sales and use tax are complimentary which means that Texas only gets to collect the tax as a sales tax paid by the purchaser at the time of the sale, or as a use tax paid by the merchant in the event the sales tax was not paid by the purchaser at the time of the sale.  Bottom line, the tax should only be paid once either as a sales tax or as a use tax.  Merchants in Texas are required under the Texas Tax Code to collect the tax as a trustee for the state of Texas.  Since the United States Supreme Court’s Wayfair decision, a couple of years ago, out of state merchants selling customers in the state of Texas could be subject to the same Texas Tax Code obligations as brick and mortal merchants operating with facilities and agents physically within the state.  The Texas Comptroller has issued guidance for out of state providers of taxable services and goods selling to customers inside Texas which can be found on the Comptroller’s website.

Any merchant inside the state or outside of the state who conducts a business subject to the Texas Limited Sales, Use and Excise Tax must obtain a sales tax permit from the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts.  Again, the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts is the chief tax collector for the State of Texas who administers the Texas Tax Code.  All kinds of useful and informative information can be found on the Comptroller’s website.

 

INTERVIEWER: Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant

Question 3: Attorney, is there any other major tax imposed by the State of Texas that impacts business owners in Texas?

 

Attorney Answer – Question 3:

Alexis, another major tax imposed in Texas is the Texas Franchise tax; which is also known as the Margin’s Tax.  The Texas Franchise Tax is a tax imposed on some businesses for the privilege of doing business in Texas. Anyone interested in this topic can find this tax in the Texas Tax Code.

Several entities subject to the Texas Franchise Tax are:

  • Corporations;
  • Limited Liability Companies (LLC, including single member and/or husband and wife owned LLC);
  • Banks;
  • State limited banking associations;
  • Savings and loan associations;
  • S Corporations;
  • Professional Corporations;
  • Partnerships (general, limited and limited liability);
  • Trusts;
  • Professional Associations;
  • Joint Ventures; and
  • Other business entities not exempt by statute

Entities not subject to the Franchise tax are:

  • Sole Proprietorships;
  • General Partnerships (when ownership consist solely of natural persons or individuals. The partnership cannot have any legal entity owners);
  • Certain grantor trusts , estates of natural persons and escrows;
  • Exempt entities under Tax Code Section 171, Subchapter B;
  • Various other unincorporated passive entities, real estate investment trusts and entities classified under Insurance Code Chapter 2212;
  • Certain trust subject to Internal Revenue Code Section 401(a) or 501(c)(9).

Alexis, the actual computation of the Texas Franchise Tax can be an extremely complicated accounting computation; and any business subject to this tax should hire a very competent Certified Public Accountant who works with business owners who must regularly pay franchise taxes.  Many businesses; perhaps most Texas businesses, who are subject to the Texas Franchise Tax only have to file a no-tax due report each year.  Franchise tax reports are filed annually online with the Texas Comptroller of Public Accounts and there are penalties for failure to file and/or failure to timely pay any franchise taxes that are due for the period.

 

INTERVIEWER: Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant
Attorney, so far, we’ve been discussing some of the taxes imposed by local governments, property tax in particular imposed locally, and some of the important taxes imposed by the State of Texas in this podcast – for example, the sales, use and excise tax and franchise tax.  There are some upcoming changes on the federal law horizon that you mentioned to me a few of days ago, and I thinking we should wrap up this podcast by explaining that.
Question 4: Attorney, can you briefly explain the Corporate Transparency Act and its key provisions?

 

Attorney Answer – Question 4:

This is a great question and it’s a very important one!

This past year, Congress passed the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) as a part of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 (AMLA). The stated goal of the AMLA was to aid the federal government in detecting and preventing money laundering, tax fraud and other illicit activities.

The Corporate Transparency Act, as a result, imposes new mandatory reporting obligations with the stated intention of catching and stopping this illicit behavior. The FinCEN reports created under this mandatory rule are called, “Beneficial Ownership Information Reports” or BOI reports. The Corporate Transparency Act will require most corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities created in or registered to do business in the United States to report information about their beneficial owners—the persons who ultimately own or control the company, to the U.S. Treasury’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).

The Corporate Transparency Act and its new reporting requirements is a huge change coming for all businesses structured under any state or tribal entity organization structuring laws and impose significant new disclosure obligations on business organizers and business owners of entities structured under state and tribal business organizational laws.  The Financial Crimes Network (FinCEN) is the U.S. Department of Treasury agency authorized to enforce the Corporate Transparency Act.

The final rules implementing the Corporate Transparency Act was published by the Financial Crimes Network (FinCEN) on September 30, 2022 in the Federal Register, and applies to domestic & foreign “reporting companies of all sizes, including the smallest of companies.”

A reporting company is a corporation, limited liability company, or any other entity created by filing entity structuring instruments with a secretary of state or any similar office under the law of a state.

  • For example, in Texas, the term “reporting companies” would include most business entities structured under the Business Organization Code, with the exception of sole proprietorships and general partnerships. If the business filed organizational documents with the Texas Secretary of State, the final FinCEN rules implementing the Corporate Transparency Act applies to them.

A “beneficial owner” under the FinCEN final rule includes any individual who, directly or indirectly:

  1. exercises substantial control over a reporting company, or
  2. owns or controls at least 25 percent of the ownership interests in a reporting company.

 

INTERVIEWER: Alexis Brewer, Tax Legal Assistant

Attorney, these sound like huge changes for business owners!  Do you mean to say that the rules apply to even a mom-and-pop business that operates as an LLC!

Question 5: What kind of information will this mom-and-pop organization and other businesses structured under state law have to file and where will they have to file it?

 

Attorney Answer – Question 5:

Yes, Alexis, that is exactly what I am saying.  The final FinCEN rules do not exempt small business from the obligations imposed on affected business organizations.  The rules apply to the mom-and-pop limited liability company as well as other businesses structured under state and tribal laws.  They all meet the definition of ‘reporting company’ and must comply with the reporting rules.

When a reporting company files a “Beneficial Ownership Information Report,” or BOI report, with the Financial Crimes Network (FinCEN), they are required to identify themselves and report four types of information about each of its beneficial owners:

  1. Name
  2. Birthdate
  3. Address, and
  4. A unique identifying number issued by a jurisdiction in an acceptable document. A copy of this acceptable identifying document must be sent to FinCEN for inspection.  The document must be valid and current.

The FinCEN final rules implementing the Corporate Transparency Act and the related new reporting obligations are effective on January 1, 2024.

  • Reporting companies created or registered before January 1, 2024 will have one year (until January 1, 2025) to file their initial BOI reports
  • Reporting companies created or registered after January 1, 2024, will have 30 days after receiving notice of their creation or registration to file their initial BOI reports.

Alexis, our law firm will continue to monitor developments with respect to the Corporate Transparency Act and FinCEN announcements implementing the BOI rules.  Our office has been filing FBAR reports with the Financial Crimes Network on behalf of taxpayers for years now; and FinCEN is where the new BOI reports will be filed as well.  Any of our listeners should follow our blogs and Legal Thoughts Podcasts where we discuss these types of topics.

 

Interviewer Wrap-Up

Attorney, thank you for siting with me today to explain the tax obligations of starting a new business in Texas. Today the key take aways from this podcast discussion are:

  1. Texas sales & use tax in Texas: This is a major tax imposed by the State of Texas impacting everyone who buys or sales goods and certain services,
  2. Texas Franchise tax: This too is a major tax imposed by the State of Texas on certain business structured under the Texas Business Organization Code and filed with the Texas Secretary of State, and potentially the big federal rule. Attorney even impacting
  3. Corporate Transparency Act: This is a new, big federal rule coming up in 2024. The new mandatory rule issued by the Financial Crimes Network (FinCEN) requires businesses structured under state or tribal entity organizational laws to file “Beneficial Ownership Information Reports” with the Financial Crimes Network. This rule is wide-reaching and will even impact the small mom-and-pop LLCs. Our office needs to watch the BOI report developments and perhaps produce future blogs, videocast and Legal Thoughts podcasts on this topic.

 

To our listeners who want to hear more podcast like this one please subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or where ever you listen to your podcast. Take care, everyone! And come back in about two weeks, for more taxation, litigation and immigration Legal Thoughts from Coleman Jackson, P.C., located right here in Dallas, Texas at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, Dallas, Texas 75206.

English callers:  214-599-0431 | Spanish callers:  214-599-0432 |Portuguese callers: 214-272-3100

 

Attorney Closing Remarks

This is the end of today’s Legal Thoughts!

Thank you all for giving us the opportunity to inform you about: “Starting Your First Business in Texas – State and Federal Tax Obligations and the Upcoming FinCEN BOI Reports”

If you want to see or hear more taxation, litigation and immigration LEGAL THOUGHTS from Coleman Jackson, P.C.  Subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or wherever you listen to your podcast.

Stay tuned!  We are here in Dallas, Texas and want to inform, educate and encourage our communities on topics dealing with taxation, litigation and immigration.  Until next time, take care.

THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS AND TAXPAYER’S OPTIONS

Coleman Jackson, P.C. | Transcript of Legal Thoughts

LEGAL THOUGHTS:  THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS AND TAXPAYER’S OPTIONS | Published November 28, 2022

Listen:

Legal Thoughts is an audiocast presentation by Coleman Jackson, P.C., a law firm based in Dallas, Texas serving individuals, businesses, and agencies from around the world in taxation, litigation, and immigration legal matters.

This episode of Legal Thoughts is an audiocast where the Attorney, Coleman Jackson is being interviewed by Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant of Coleman Jackson, P.C. The topic of discussion is “THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS AND TAXPAYER’S OPTIONS.” You can listen to this podcast by clicking here: https://anchor.fm/coleman-jackson/episodes/THE-IRS-COLLECTION-PROCESS-AND-TAXPAYERS-OPTIONS–ENGLISH-VERSION-e1ooft6

If you enjoy this podcast, make sure to stay tuned for more episodes from the taxation, litigation, and immigration Law Firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. Be sure to subscribe. Visit the taxation, litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, P.C. online at www.cjacksonlaw.com.

TRANSCRIPT:

ATTORNEY: Coleman Jackson

LEGAL THOUGHTS

COLEMAN JACKSON, ATTORNEY & COUNSELOR AT LAW

ATTORNEY: Coleman Jackson

Welcome to Legal Thoughts

  • My name is Coleman Jackson and I am an attorney at Coleman Jackson, P.C., a taxation, contracts litigation and immigration law firm based in Dallas, Texas.
  • Other members of the law firm are Alexis Brewer and Johana Powell – Tax Legal Assistants, Leiliane Godeiro – Litigation Legal Assistant, and Gladys Marcos – Immigration Legal Assistant.
  • On today’s “Legal Thoughts” podcast, our Tax Legal Assistant, Johana Powell, will be interviewing me on the important topic of: “THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS AND TAXPAYER’S OPTIONS.”

INTERVIEWER: Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant

Hi everyone, my name is Johana Powell and I am a Tax Legal Assistant at the tax, litigation and immigration law firm of Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation. Our law firm is located at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, right here in Dallas, Texas.

Good afternoon, Attorney; thank you for agreeing to sit with me as I interview you with respect to this interesting topic: “THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS AND TAXPAYER’S OPTIONS.”

Let’s get started!

Question 1:

Attorney what is likely to happen when a taxpayer files a tax due return with the IRS?

Attorney Answer – Question 1:

Good afternoon, Johana.

When a taxpayer files a tax return with the IRS, they can expect the following to happen in short order:  If a balance is due on the return;

  1. the IRS will— Put the balance due on its books; technically that step is called ‘tax assessment’ under tax law;

the IRS will— Send the taxpayer a bill requesting full payment by a certain date;

In the event the taxpayer fails to pay the first bill in full or contact the IRS to make payment arrangements, the IRS will send the taxpayer a second bill requesting full payment of all taxes, penalties and interest due by a certain date;

  1. In the event the taxpayer fails to pay the second bill in full or contact the IRS to make alternate payment  arrangements, the IRS will pull tools out of its collections tool box and rachet up the heat on the recalcitrant        taxpayer.

INTERVIEWER: Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant

Okay attorney; how much heat can the taxpayer expect to be coming their way if they fail to voluntarily pay that tax debt!

QUESTION 2: Explain what collection tools are in the IRS collection’s tool box?

Attorney Answer – Question 2:

Johana, taxpayers who owe the IRS need to understand that the law gives the IRS broad authority and awesome powers to collect delinquent federal taxes, penalties and interest without any involvement of the courts.  In fact, injunctive relief is not available to the taxpayer.  Taxpayers cannot get any court to enjoin the IRS in its collection efforts.  Taxpayers may have the right to seek that federal courts review and quash some of these collection tools that I am about to discuss; but extremely strict rules apply to quashing an IRS action.  The IRS is authorized under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code; which is codified in 26 United States Code, to collect taxes by use of its collection tools:

1. The IRS is authorized to apply all refunds due to any delinquent tax debt owned by the taxpayer until the delinquent taxes, penalties and interest are paid in full;

2. The IRS is authorized to file a federal tax lien in the property records wherever the taxpayer has property.  The IRS tax lien attaches to all property owned by the taxpayer at the time the lien is recorded in the records and it also attaches to all property of any kind the taxpayer may have in the future until the taxes, penalties and interest are paid in full or the lien is lawfully released;

3. The IRS is authorized to assign a Revenue Officer to physically contact the taxpayer at home or at the taxpayer’s business without notice in an attempt to collect the taxes, penalties and interest owed;

4. The IRS is authorized to summon the taxpayer or third party to appear in the IRS offices to give testimony and produce relevant documents to an IRS Officer;

5.  The IRS is authorized to serve a levy on third parties to collect the taxes, penalties and interest owed by the taxpayer.  For example, the IRS levy and seize the taxpayers bank accounts, wages and other monies owed the taxpayer or held on behalf of the taxpayer; and

6. The IRS collections division is authorized to make criminal referrals to the IRS Criminal Division for criminal investigation and potential criminal tax charges against the taxpayer and others aiding and abetting the taxpayer in violation of U.S. Tax Laws; and finally;

7.  The IRS is authorized to file a declaration with the U.S. Department of State declaring the taxpayer’s account seriously delinquent; thereby, informing the U.S. Department of State that the seriously delinquent taxpayer’s U.S. Passport should be revoked or the taxpayer’s passport renewal should be denied.

Let me point out clearly here; all of the collection tools that I have discussed here can be used by the IRS without any court involvement or supervision what-so-ever!

INTERVIEWER: Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant

Well with all that potential heat!  What are the actions that the taxpayer should take when they receive a tax bill from the IRS?

Attorney Answer – Question 3:

  1. The taxpayer should immediately open the correspondence from the IRS as soon as they receive it.  That is the very first thing the taxpayer should do.  Time is of the essence because critical deadlines to act are often in IRS correspondence.  By failing to act, taxpayers can forsake very important rights.  For example, the right to seek relief in the U.S. Tax Court without first paying the taxes, penalties and interest due comes in a 90-day letter from the IRS.  Failure to act within 90 days and you lose that right forever.
  2. Second, the taxpayer should read the correspondence carefully; and if they don’t understand it, they should either contact the IRS and arrange to discuss it with them; or, contact an attorney, accountant or IRS enrolled agent and schedule an appointment and bring the IRS correspondence with them to their initial meeting.
  3. Third thing that needs to happen is that the taxpayer will need to decide what further actions they need to take; that is going to depend upon the following
    1. What actions are the IRS requesting the taxpayer to take in the correspondence, if any;
    2. If it’s a tax bill or notice of tax adjustment where the IRS is requesting a payment by a date certain-
      1. In the event the taxpayer agrees that they owe the taxes, penalties and interest, the taxpayer either needs to pay in full or negotiate some kind of payment arrangement with the IRS;
      2. In the event the taxpayer disagrees with the balance owed or any part of it; the taxpayer needs to exercise its collection due process rights, or the taxpayer’s right to challenge the assessment in court within the deadlines set forth in the IRS correspondence, or exercise any number of other rights the taxpayer may have depending upon all the facts and circumstances.
  1. Taxpayers dealing with the IRS should seriously seek professional representation; especially, if they are certain about what the tax issues are or they are in great civil and criminal exposure.

INTERVIEWER: Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant

Question 4: Attorney Jackson, what happens if the taxpayer cannot pay the taxes, penalties and interest in full?

Attorney Answer – Question 4:

Again, the particular options available to a taxpayer is going to depend on all the facts and circumstances.  Facts matters, such as, the type of tax debt; such as, income taxes, business taxes, payroll taxes, excise taxes and things like that.  The amount of the tax debt is very important as to what options are going to be available to resolve the matter.  The taxpayer’s history with the IRS also can matter a lot.  Anyway, all the facts and circumstances matter as to what options are available.  Some of the options that might be available are

  1. Negotiate a full pay or partial pay installment payment arrangement with the IRS. Again, depending on all the facts and circumstances the taxpayer may be able to apply for an installment agreement at irs.gov, on the phone, by mail or by visiting an IRS local office.  Again, whether this can be done is going to depend upon the amount of the tax debt, the tax payer’s prior history, the taxpayer’s current tax compliance, and a lot of other things.  The taxpayer may want to consult and attorney or other professional whenever they are dealing with large tax debts, unfiled tax returns and other times when they have criminal exposure due to their actions or inactions as far as it goes in terms of compliance with U.S. federal tax laws.
  2. The fresh start or offer in compromise might be available for some taxpayers.  There are some options for these taxpayers but they must act promptly once they receive their bills. The taxpayer that cannot pay in full may apply for an installment agreement, which consists in a payment plan so the IRS will allow you to make smaller periodic payments according with your financial capacity. Usually, you can apply for the installment agreement online, by phone, by mail, or in person in one of the local offices, however, this is just possible when it is early in the process. When a taxpayer has a big tax debt or it is past due from several years and has interest and penalties accrued for a long period of time, you should consult with your tax attorney.  An offer in compromise is sought to settle unpaid taxes for less than the full amount owed, the IRS may accept an OIC when the Service believe that the taxpayer’s tax debt might not be accurate, or when the taxpayer has proven to the OIC division of the IRS that the taxpayer does not have sufficient assets and income to pay the tax debt, or because paying the debt would cause the taxpayer undue hardship. In recent years, not many offers in compromise request are approved.  The IRS is more likely to accept a partial pay installment agreement or put the taxpayer’s account in uncollectable status and review it in subsequent years to determine whether the tax debt is collectible.

INTERVIEWER: Johana Powell, Tax Legal Assistant

Attorney, thank you for siting with me today to inform us about the IRS collection process and taxpayer’s options, it is very important for the taxpayers to be aware of this information. In United States all individuals and businesses must prepare tax returns, it is important to maintain records of this returns, and to make them accurate to avoid issues with the IRS.

Our listeners who want to hear more podcast like this one should subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or where ever you listen to your podcast.  Everybody takes care!  And come back in about two weeks, for more taxation, contracts, litigation and immigration Legal Thoughts from Coleman Jackson, P.C., located right here in Dallas, Texas at 6060 North Central Expressway, Suite 620, Dallas, Texas 75206.

English callers:  214-599-0431 | Spanish callers:  214-599-0432 |Portuguese callers: 214-272-3100

Attorney Closing Remarks

This is the end of today’s Legal Thoughts!

Thank you for giving us the opportunity to inform you about: “THE IRS COLLECTION PROCESS.”

If you want to see or hear more taxation, contracts litigation and immigration LEGAL THOUGHTS from Coleman Jackson, Professional Corporation.  Subscribe to our Legal Thoughts Podcast on Apple Podcast, Google Podcast, Spotify or wherever you listen to your podcast.

Stay tuned!  We are here in Dallas, Texas and want to inform, educate and encourage our communities on topics dealing with taxation, litigation and immigration.  Until next time, take care.